The internet may be full of temptations and problems and distractions, but it is also a very great blessing.
When one is away from home, one has contact with family and friends through email and chat and potentially through skype or vonage soft phones. That is a good thing. Also, when in a strange place where one’s native language is not spoken in the local congregations, it brings sermons and bible readings through MP3 files or whatever streaming media.
I have heard pastors talking about the internet as a great evil, and I take exception to that. It is not a force at all, and not an evil at all. It is a means of connection. One can connect to good things or bad things. There are sites that are not healthy and good, but there are others which are very fine. There are chats with remote wives and children, and then there are sex chats with strangers. There are predators, but there are others who make useful software or educational facilities available to the everyday person for no charge at all — out of the goodness of their hearts.
The only good and only evil on the internet is the evil that is in the hearts of those who are using the internet. There is only virtue and evil in people, in their intentions and actions. The internet is a powerful thing, but it has no agenda. It is amoral, just as a car can be used to drive the family to church or maybe to visit a loved one in the hospital or it can be used to help access reach a drug dealer or prostitute. The internet is a vehicle. It’s up to us to drive wisely.
Pastors who speak against the internet are risking the alienation of those who have a better handle on what’s really going on. You never want to “flip the bozo bit” — to be so clearly and obviously wrong that the congregation quits listening to you. We’ve already seen this with radio and television and even the automobile — pastors have been so dead-set against human progress and access to the undesirable that they’ve missed the point entirely and have lost the voice that they could have had. If a pastor is against poor content, let him provide good content. More sermon podcasts, more church sites, more promotion of charitable causes, more blogs on the Christian life. In this way, the ratio of evil-to-good is diminished, and the likelihood of overcoming evil with good is increased.
Let’s not refuse change — that is the sin that the church leaders had in Christ’s day. They preserved traditions against the will of God, and persecuted those who understood how to live “in the world and not of it”. Can we accept the idea that we should have access to other people, good and bad, and that they should have access to us? We can’t closet-in the gospel. Our light should shine everywhere, should it not? Our city should be on a hill?